Tuesday, 3 April 2012

William Shakespeare, As You Like It


3.

     Before I begin, I’ll add a few more words about Renaissance, which I’ve again borrowed from the Russian historian A.F. Losev and foully converted into English (I only confess it to avoid plagiarism). The time when Shakespeare and Marlowe created their unforgettable masterpieces is rather a decline of Renaissance. Towards the end of the golden age the humanism passed through a crises. Freedom of willpower was turned to destruction of those who did not subordinate to the authority, while the beginning of the golden age was full of gay hopes to free the human from the spiritual chains of the Middle Ages.  Yet what signifies the works of Renaissance activists, is realism. (End of Losev’s loan). However, it would be naive to imagine the life during that time like it is in Shakespeare’s comedies. It would be more relevant to the assignment, I think, to consider the other works of Shakespeare, such as Macbeth or Richard III, for these events are closer to what was going on at that time. But because “there may be more than one way of rendering this  story”, I’ll try this one.
The pastoral ideal, which Shakespeare explores in his comedy As you Like It, is a world that fell out of time, that is the world, where time moves along its own exclusive circle. Time in this circle does not bring any qualitative changes. Most scenes of the play take place in the forest of Arden, where a “good guy” – Duke Senior, banished by a “bad guy” – Duke Frederick, carries on a healthy and simple life, which he praises so persuasively:

Now, my co-mates and brothers in exile,
Hath not old custom made this life more sweet
Than that of painted pomp? Are not these woods
More free from peril  than the envious court?
..........................................................................
And this our life, exempt from public haunt,
Finds tongues in trees, books in the running brooks,
Sermons in stones, and good in everything.
I would not change it. (II. 1)

This pastoral landscape is permeated by humanity, in opposition to the savage laws which prevail at the court from where Duke Senior is banished. By describing delights of country life among sweet shepherds and shepherdesses, Shakespeare expresses a protest against the brutality and depravity of the feudal courts.
     Interestingly, everyone in this comedy who steps into the forest, leaves it entirely or partially changed. In the forest, free from urban laws, they learn to love. The most obvious example is vicious Oliver, who learns to love his brother Orlando the moment he enters the forest (IV, 3). Of Duke Frederick, the villain of the piece, Jacques says:

And to the skirts of this wild wood he came;
Where, meeting with an old religious man,
After some questions with him, was converted
Both from his enterprise and from the world;
His crown bequeathing to his banished brother...(V,4)

Healing properties of the forest are indeed surprising. However, I believe that what Shakespeare expresses by describing all the changes that occur to the most vicious people, is his believe that being vicious is not the man’s nature, and everyone can change for the good, if he wants to. It is not the miraculous forest, but the very human power - to be able to change. We are not born bad or good, we become.
In his comedy, Shakespeare reflects the society, wittily emphasizing satirical moments. Some personages of the comedy judge the viciousness of the urban society. For example, the clever “fool” Touchstone, although he himself is poisoned with the court culture, unmasks the hypocrisy and vulgarity of the aristocracy.  The old honest servant Adam laments about the decay of the customs modern to Shakespeare:
Know you not, master, to some kind of men
Their graces serve them but as enemies?
No more do yours; your virtues, gentle master,
Are sanctified and holy traitors to you. (II, 12-15)

Orlando, in his turn, praising generosity of Adam’s soul, calls him an example of
The constant service of the antique world,
When service sweat for duty, not for meed! (II, 3)

Usurping of the throne by the bad guy Duke Frederick, and the robbery of Orlando by his brother are a reflection of the unlawful and evil misdeeds, pursuits of easy money, callousness of the urban life. Compared to that, the life of the banished Duke Senior and his co-mates in the forest indeed is full of moral purity and humanity. It is not surprise then, that their living in the forest is compared to  Robin Hood’s, the hero of English ballads, who gathered around him a troop of “noble” robbers with the purpose of struggle against bad rich people for the good of poor (I, 1).
 Picturing the pastoral life, Shakespeare changes the traditional pastoral genre, adding to it a certain amount of realism. In the traditional genre, developed before Shakespeare, we had eternally sighing shepherds and shepherdesses, who wrote each other sweet little poems, praising each other’s petals of cheeks, gems of eyes and pearls of teeth. In this comedy, the description of life in the nature is more realistic, although Shakespeare partially preserved  the pastoral style of the old, for example the suffering shepherd Silvius, desperately in love with Phoebe. However, there is an element of parody, for Shakespeare juxtaposes sweet-scented Silvius with the simple-minded  goatherd Audrey, whose words and behavior in opposition to Silvius’ are full of common sense. Also breaking of the pastoral ideal here is achieved with presentation of the realistic dirty-handed shepherd Corin, complaining about the severe nature of his “boss” – rich shepherd. Thus Shakespeare adds realistic moments to the dream-like picturing of life in nature.It is very important that Shakespeare, paying homage to the realistic version of pastoral genre, overcomes pastoral ideal through stressing that the life of the banished in the forest is forced. It is delightful only till the moment, when the triumph over the evil forces permits the banished come back to the real and active urban life. Only the peevish dreamer Jaques, full of misanthropy, who prefers loneliness to the society, remains in the forest.
In his comedy Shakespeare creates the world of benevolence, which enriches and decorates human life. Manifestations of this humanity are love and friendship. Glorifying of love and friendship in this comedy as well as in others is connected with a dream about better life, where money serves people without making them its slaves. It is a dream about world where people are free, where they don’t have to be afraid of usurpers and churches, where they love each other, where the good triumphs over the evil. Therefore, I would suggest, the voice of Rosalind in this comedy is the voice of Shakespeare: her common sense invites people forget about hatred, envy, pride. She pleads people to love each other:

...I charge
you, O women, for the love you bear to men, to like as much
of this play as please you: and I charge you, O, men, for the love
you bear to women; - as I perceive by your simpering, none of you
hates them .....(Epilogue)

No comments:

Post a Comment